Theft of Presidency |
Corporate America |
Globalization |
The Bush Family |
Power Companies |
Tony Blair |
Lobbygate |
Exxon Valdez |
Microsoft |
Media Free Speech |
Pinochet |
Pat Robertson |
Small Towns |
Bush blocked
Bin Laden probes «view now» |
Gregory Palast
reports "Theft of the Presidency" on BBC TV's Newsnight «view now» |
Bush Energy
Plan: Policy or Payback? «view now» |
What really
happened in Florida? «view now» |
|
The Globalizer Who Came
In From the Cold
Observer,
London
Wednesday, October 10,
2001
JOE
STIGLITZ: TODAY’S WINNER OF THE NOBEL PRIZE IN
ECONOMICS
by Greg Palast
The World Bank’s
former Chief Economist’s accusations are eye-popping -
including how the IMF and US Treasury fixed the Russian
elections
"It has condemned people to death," the
former apparatchik told me. This was like a scene out of Le
Carre. The brilliant old agent comes in from the cold, crosses
to our side, and in hours of debriefing, empties his memory of
horrors committed in the name of a political ideology he now
realizes has gone rotten.
And here before me was a far
bigger catch than some used Cold War spy. Joseph Stiglitz was
Chief Economist of the World Bank. To a great extent, the new
world economic order was his theory come to life.
I
"debriefed" Stigltiz over several days, at Cambridge
University, in a London hotel and finally in Washington in
April 2001 during the big confab of the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund. But instead of chairing the
meetings of ministers and central bankers, Stiglitz was kept
exiled safely behind the blue police cordons, the same as the
nuns carrying a large wooden cross, the Bolivian union
leaders, the parents of AIDS victims and the other
‘anti-globalization’ protesters. The ultimate insider was now
on the outside.
In 1999 the World Bank fired Stiglitz.
He was not allowed quiet retirement; US Treasury Secretary
Larry Summers, I’m told, demanded a public excommunication for
Stiglitz’ having expressed his first mild dissent from
globalization World Bank style.
Here in Washington we
completed the last of several hours of exclusive interviews
for The Observer and BBC TV’s Newsnight about the real, often
hidden, workings of the IMF, World Bank, and the bank’s 51%
owner, the US Treasury.
And here, from sources
unnamable (not Stiglitz), we obtained a cache of documents
marked, "confidential," "restricted," and "not otherwise (to
be) disclosed without World Bank authorization."
Stiglitz helped translate one from bureaucratise, a
"Country Assistance Strategy." There’s an Assistance Strategy
for every poorer nation, designed, says the World Bank, after
careful in-country investigation. But according to insider
Stiglitz, the Bank’s staff ‘investigation’ consists of close
inspection of a nation’s 5-star hotels. It concludes with the
Bank staff meeting some begging, busted finance minister who
is handed a ‘restructuring agreement’ pre-drafted for his
‘voluntary’ signature (I have a selection of
these).
Each nation’s economy is individually analyzed,
then, says Stiglitz, the Bank hands every minister the same
exact four-step program.
Step One is Privatization -
which Stiglitz said could more accurately be called,
‘Briberization.’ Rather than object to the sell-offs of state
industries, he said national leaders - using the World Bank’s
demands to silence local critics - happily flogged their
electricity and water companies. "You could see their eyes
widen" at the prospect of 10% commissions paid to Swiss bank
accounts for simply shaving a few billion off the sale price
of national assets.
And the US government knew it,
charges Stiglitz, at least in the case of the biggest
‘briberization’ of all, the 1995 Russian sell-off. "The US
Treasury view was this was great as we wanted Yeltsin
re-elected. We don’t care if it’s a corrupt election. We want
the money to go to Yeltzin" via kick-backs for his
campaign.
Stiglitz is no conspiracy nutter ranting
about Black Helicopters. The man was inside the game, a member
of Bill Clinton’s cabinet as Chairman of the President’s
council of economic advisors.
Most ill-making for
Stiglitz is that the US-backed oligarchs stripped Russia’s
industrial assets, with the effect that the corruption scheme
cut national output nearly in half causing depression and
starvation.
After briberization, Step Two of the
IMF/World Bank one-size-fits-all rescue-your-economy plan is
‘Capital Market Liberalization.’ In theory, capital market
deregulation allows investment capital to flow in and out.
Unfortunately, as in Indonesia and Brazil, the money simply
flowed out and out. Stiglitz calls this the "Hot Money" cycle.
Cash comes in for speculation in real estate and currency,
then flees at the first whiff of trouble. A nation’s reserves
can drain in days, hours. And when that happens, to seduce
speculators into returning a nation’s own capital funds, the
IMF demands these nations raise interest rates to 30%, 50% and
80%.
"The result was predictable," said Stiglitz of the
Hot Money tidal waves in Asia and Latin America. Higher
interest rates demolished property values, savaged industrial
production and drained national treasuries.
At this
point, the IMF drags the gasping nation to Step Three:
Market-Based Pricing, a fancy term for raising prices on food,
water and cooking gas. This leads, predictably, to
Step-Three-and-a-Half: what Stiglitz calls, ‘The IMF riot.’
The IMF riot is painfully predictable. When a nation
is, "down and out, [the IMF] takes advantage and squeezes the
last pound of blood out of them. They turn up the heat until,
finally, the whole cauldron blows up," as when the IMF
eliminated food and fuel subsidies for the poor in Indonesia
in 1998. Indonesia exploded into riots, but there are other
examples - the Bolivian riots over water prices last year and
this February, the riots in Ecuador over the rise in cooking
gas prices imposed by the World Bank. You’d almost get the
impression that the riot is written into the plan.
And
it is. What Stiglitz did not know is that, while in the
States, BBC and The Observer obtained several documents from
inside the World Bank, stamped over with those pesky warnings,
"confidential," "restricted," "not to be disclosed." Let’s get
back to one: the "Interim Country Assistance Strategy" for
Ecuador, in it the Bank several times states - with cold
accuracy - that they expected their plans to spark, "social
unrest," to use their bureaucratic term for a nation in
flames.
That’s not surprising. The secret report notes
that the plan to make the US dollar Ecuador’s currency has
pushed 51% of the population below the poverty line. The World
Bank "Assistance" plan simply calls for facing down civil
strife and suffering with, "political resolve" - and still
higher prices.
The IMF riots (and by riots I mean
peaceful demonstrations dispersed by bullets, tanks and
teargas) cause new panicked flights of capital and government
bankruptcies. This economic arson has it’s bright side - for
foreign corporations, who can then pick off remaining assets,
such as the odd mining concession or port, at fire sale
prices.
Stiglitz notes that the IMF and World Bank are
not heartless adherents to market economics. At the same time
the IMF stopped Indonesia ‘subsidizing’ food purchases, "when
the banks need a bail-out, intervention (in the market) is
welcome." The IMF scrounged up tens of billions of dollars to
save Indonesia’s financiers and, by extension, the US and
European banks from which they had borrowed.
A pattern
emerges. There are lots of losers in this system but one clear
winner: the Western banks and US Treasury, making the big
bucks off this crazy new international capital churn. Stiglitz
told me about his unhappy meeting, early in his World Bank
tenure, with Ethopia’s new president in the nation’s first
democratic election. The World Bank and IMF had ordered
Ethiopia to divert aid money to its reserve account at the US
Treasury, which pays a pitiful 4% return, while the nation
borrowed US dollars at 12% to feed its population. The new
president begged Stiglitz to let him use the aid money to
rebuild the nation. But no, the loot went straight off to the
US Treasury’s vault in Washington.
Now we arrive at
Step Four of what the IMF and World Bank call their "poverty
reduction strategy": Free Trade. This is free trade by the
rules of the World Trade Organization and World Bank, Stiglitz
the insider likens free trade WTO-style to the Opium Wars.
"That too was about opening markets," he said. As in the 19th
century, Europeans and Americans today are kicking down the
barriers to sales in Asia, Latin American and Africa, while
barricading our own markets against Third World agriculture.
In the Opium Wars, the West used military blockades to
force open markets for their unbalanced trade. Today, the
World Bank can order a financial blockade just as effective -
and sometimes just as deadly.
Stiglitz is particularly
emotional over the WTO’s intellectual property rights treaty
(it goes by the acronym TRIPS, more on that in the next
chapters). It is here, says the economist, that the new global
order has "condemned people to death" by imposing impossible
tariffs and tributes to pay to pharmaceutical companies for
branded medicines. "They don’t care," said the professor of
the corporations and bank loans he worked with, "if people
live or die."
By the way, don’t be confused by the mix
in this discussion of the IMF, World Bank and WTO. They are
interchangeable masks of a single governance system. They have
locked themselves together by what are unpleasantly called,
"triggers." Taking a World Bank loan for a school ‘triggers’ a
requirement to accept every ‘conditionality’ - they average
111 per nation - laid down by both the World Bank and IMF. In
fact, said Stiglitz the IMF requires nations to accept trade
policies more punitive than the official WTO
rules.
Stiglitz greatest concern is that World Bank
plans, devised in secrecy and driven by an absolutist
ideology, are never open for discourse or dissent. Despite the
West’s push for elections throughout the developing world, the
so-called Poverty Reduction Programs "undermine democracy."
And they don’t work. Black Africa’s productivity under
the guiding hand of IMF structural "assistance" has gone to
hell in a handbag. Did any nation avoid this fate? Yes, said
Stiglitz, identifying Botswana. Their trick? "They told the
IMF to go packing."
So then I turned on Stiglitz. OK,
Mr Smart-Guy Professor, how would you help developing nations?
Stiglitz proposed radical land reform, an attack at the heart
of "landlordism," on the usurious rents charged by the
propertied oligarchies worldwide, typically 50% of a tenant’s
crops. So I had to ask the professor: as you were top
economist at the World Bank, why didn’t the Bank follow your
advice?
"If you challenge [land ownership], that would
be a change in the power of the elites. That’s not high on
their agenda." Apparently not.
Ultimately, what drove
him to put his job on the line was the failure of the banks
and US Treasury to change course when confronted with the
crises - failures and suffering perpetrated by their four-step
monetarist mambo. Every time their free market solutions
failed, the IMF simply demanded more free market
policies.
"It’s a little like the Middle Ages," the
insider told me, "When the patient died they would say, ‘well,
he stopped the bloodletting too soon, he still had a little
blood in him.’"
I took away from my talks with the
professor that the solution to world poverty and crisis is
simple: remove the bloodsuckers.
*A version of this was first
published as "The IMF’s Four Steps to Damnation" in The
Observer (London) in April and another version in The Big
Issue - that’s the magazine that the homeless flog on
platforms in the London Underground. Big Issue offered equal
space to the IMF, whose "deputy chief media officer"
wrote:
"... I find it impossible to respond given the
depth and breadth of hearsay and misinformation in [Palast’s]
report."
Of course it was difficult for the Deputy
Chief to respond. The information (and documents) came from
the unhappy lot inside his agency and the World
Bank.
You can still view the BBC TV's,
"Theft of the Presidency," at BBC
News |NEWSNIGHT |16/2/01Read A
blacklist burning for Bush The (London) Observer; Florida's
ethnic cleansing of voter rolls/Salon.com Story of the
Year; in The
Nation, Florida's Disappeared Voters; US media
failures at SILENCE
OF THE LAMBS; and on Bush family finances: Best
Democracy Money Can Buy.Award-winning
reporter Palast writes Inside Corporate America for the
London Observer. To read other Palast reports, to contact the
author or to subscribe to his column, go to GregPalast.Com
|
| |